The Credit Card Competition Act: Balancing Retailer’s Demands and Consumer’s Interests

A Spotlight on the Credit Card Competition Act

The Credit Card Competition Act is causing quite a stir in the realm of financial transactions. The legislation, targeting the formidable duopoly of Visa and Mastercard, aims to foster a competitive landscape in credit card processing. The Act mandates large banks to offer an alternative payment network for card transactions, a move that could shift the balance of power in favor of merchants.

Retail giants and small businesses alike, numbering around 2000, are rallying behind this bill. Their stance is clear – high interchange fees are inflating business costs, which in turn, are passed onto consumers. They argue that the Act could potentially alleviate this issue, leading to cost savings that could be passed on to consumers.

However, an eerily similar attempt made in the past—the Durbin Amendment—yielded lackluster results. Despite promises of driving competition in debit card processing, a survey from the Richmond Federal Reserve revealed that only 1.2% of the merchants surveyed actually reduced their prices, and a mere 11.1% reported a decrease in their debit card processing costs.

An image of a credit card and credit card reader, being used by a consumer at a point of sale

Major Players Voice Opposition

While the Act garners support from retailers, it faces stern opposition from major credit card companies—Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and Capital One. They contend that if the bill were to pass, the negative impact on consumers could be significant.

In June, the Electronic Payments Coalition, a representative group for many big banks, financial institutions, and credit unions, released a joint statement opposing the Credit Card Competition Act. They argue that the Act would enrich big-box retailers like Walmart and Target while eroding the value that consumers derive from rewards and other benefits associated with credit cards.  The Coalition also points to the failure of the Durbin Amendment, which promised to pass savings from capped debit card interchange fees onto consumers—a promise that was never fulfilled.

Despite the opposition, the Act enjoys bipartisan support, which means credit card companies have an uphill battle to win over sympathizers. Aaron Stetter, Executive Director of the Electronic Payments Coalition, raised concerns that consumers might be misled about their credit card processing. Consumers might assume transactions are being processed through familiar networks like Visa or Mastercard, while they could be routed through cheaper alternatives offering fewer fraud protections and rewards.

Navigating the Swipe Fee Terrain

Swipe fees have a crucial role to play in this unfolding saga. In just a decade, these fees have shot up, doubling to an astonishing $160.7 billion in 2022. To combat these escalating costs, some businesses have introduced an additional charge for customers paying with credit or debit cards. This strategy aims to push consumers towards cash transactions, helping businesses bypass these fees.

Weighing the Pros and Cons: Consumers in the Crossfire

While the Act seeks to change the status quo, it also raises an important question: ‘What will be the impact on consumers?’ Critics fear consumers might end up being routed through a cheaper and potentially less secure network with fewer rewards. This concern arises because the Act gives the authority of choosing the transaction’s routing path to merchants rather than card issuers or consumers.

A woman's hand holding a credit card over a credit card receipt

The Search for Alternatives and the Future of Credit Card Processing

Amid the ongoing debates over the Act, some businesses are exploring alternative ways to cut down on high fees. Companies are using technology to create alternative payment networks, reducing dependence on traditional giants like Visa and Mastercard.

Whatever the fate of the Credit Card Competition Act, it’s clear that the discourse has emphasized the importance of competition and consumer choice in credit card processing. The final outcome of this saga will undoubtedly reshape the dynamic between retailers, payment processors, and consumers and set a new course for credit card transactions in the future.

At Global Legal Law Firm, our lawyers are familiar with the rapidly changing nature of electronic payments processing processors, and the ever changing regulations involved, with decades of expertise in ISOs, commercial collections, credit card brands, and other forms of electronic payment processing litigation. Let us guide you through this new and volatile environment, rather than attempting to navigate it on your own.

Recommended Posts